7 research outputs found
GPTEval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment
The quality of texts generated by natural language generation (NLG) systems
is hard to measure automatically. Conventional reference-based metrics, such as
BLEU and ROUGE, have been shown to have relatively low correlation with human
judgments, especially for tasks that require creativity and diversity. Recent
studies suggest using large language models (LLMs) as reference-free metrics
for NLG evaluation, which have the benefit of being applicable to new tasks
that lack human references. However, these LLM-based evaluators still have
lower human correspondence than medium-size neural evaluators. In this work, we
present GPTEval, a framework of using large language models with
chain-of-thoughts (CoT) and a form-filling paradigm, to assess the quality of
NLG outputs. We experiment with two generation tasks, text summarization and
dialogue generation. We show that GPTEval with GPT-4 as the backbone model
achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.514 with human on summarization task,
outperforming all previous methods by a large margin. We also propose
preliminary analysis on the behavior of LLM-based evaluators, and highlight the
potential issue of LLM-based evaluators having a bias towards the LLM-generated
texts
The Shifted and The Overlooked: A Task-oriented Investigation of User-GPT Interactions
Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) has produced models that
exhibit remarkable performance across a variety of NLP tasks. However, it
remains unclear whether the existing focus of NLP research accurately captures
the genuine requirements of human users. This paper provides a comprehensive
analysis of the divergence between current NLP research and the needs of
real-world NLP applications via a large-scale collection of user-GPT
conversations. We analyze a large-scale collection of real user queries to GPT.
We compare these queries against existing NLP benchmark tasks and identify a
significant gap between the tasks that users frequently request from LLMs and
the tasks that are commonly studied in academic research. For example, we find
that tasks such as ``design'' and ``planning'' are prevalent in user
interactions but are largely neglected or different from traditional NLP
benchmarks. We investigate these overlooked tasks, dissect the practical
challenges they pose, and provide insights toward a roadmap to make LLMs better
aligned with user needs.Comment: EMNLP 202
Identifying Content for Planned Events Across Social Media Sites
User-contributed Web data contains rich and diverse information about a variety of events in the physical world, such as shows, festivals, conferences and more. This information ranges from known event features (e.g., title, time, location) posted on event aggregation platforms (e.g., Last.fm events, EventBrite, Facebook events) to discussions and reactions related to events shared on different social media sites (e.g., Twitter, YouTube, Flickr). In this paper, we focus on the challenge of automatically identifying user-contributed content for events that are planned and, therefore, known in advance, across different social media sites. We mine event aggregation platforms to extract event features, which are often noisy or missing. We use these features to develop query formulation strategies for retrieving content associated with an event on different social media sites. Further, we explore ways in which event content identified on one social media site can be used to retrieve additional relevant event content on other social media sites. We apply our strategies to a large set of user-contributed events, and analyze their effectiveness in retrieving relevant event content from Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr
Automatic identification and presentation of Twitter content for planned events
We demonstrate a system for augmenting information about planned events with Twitter messages, using a set of automatic query building strategies. We present two alternative interfaces to our system, namely, a browser plug-in and a customizable Web interface.
Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance as general
purpose agents, but their abilities remain highly dependent on prompts which
are hand written with onerous trial-and-error effort. We propose a simple and
nonparametric solution to this problem, Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO),
which is inspired by numerical gradient descent to automatically improve
prompts, assuming access to training data and an LLM API. The algorithm uses
minibatches of data to form natural language ``gradients'' that criticize the
current prompt. The gradients are then ``propagated'' into the prompt by
editing the prompt in the opposite semantic direction of the gradient. These
gradient descent steps are guided by a beam search and bandit selection
procedure which significantly improves algorithmic efficiency. Preliminary
results across three benchmark NLP tasks and the novel problem of LLM jailbreak
detection suggest that Automatic Prompt Optimization can outperform prior
prompt editing techniques and improve an initial prompt's performance by up to
31\%, by using data to rewrite vague task descriptions into more precise
annotation instructions